
DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM run on infrastructure bound by Chinese law.
Privatemode runs the same models in the EU, encrypted end-to-end.

Privatemode self-hosts the same open-weight DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM releases you'd use directly. Nothing changes about output quality, model quality isn't the argument here, jurisdiction is.

Prompts and files processed through Privatemode stay inside confidential-computing environments hosted and operated in the EU. Using DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, or GLM directly means your data is processed on infrastructure located in, and operated under, China.

Data processed through Privatemode is governed by GDPR, with no exposure to a foreign intelligence law. Providers operating under Chinese jurisdiction can be compelled to share data with the state, independent of how the provider intends to behave.

Privatemode encrypts prompts and files end-to-end and processes them only inside an isolated environment. Neither Privatemode, the cloud, nor the model's original lab can see the plaintext. Using the provider's own hosted API means your data is processed in plaintext on their infrastructure, protected only by policy.
Same models, different jurisdiction. DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM run under Chinese law when used directly. Privatemode runs the identical models in the EU, under GDPR, hardware-enforced.
The same open-weight Chinese models, self-hosted in EU confidential computing. Nobody, including Privatemode, can access your data.
The same models, used directly from the Chinese provider. Prompts and files are processed in plaintext on their infrastructure.
We're happy to show you around and give an overview of what's possible.
Privatemode vs. Chinese AI providers
Yes. Privatemode hosts the same open-weight models released by their Chinese labs. Model quality is identical. Privatemode only changes where and how your data is processed.
Trusted by security-critical teams at enterprises and public institutions
